Sign in or 
- EasyEdit
- Edit tags
-
(what's this?What are these tools?
People just like you can add or edit the content on this site. If you want to try editing, but aren't ready to add to this site, try our demo area.
Read more about editing pages at Wetpaint Central.
) - Report page
Share this
Zarina
Be honest I do not care wether it is reliable or not. I do not
search information that is reliable for me by online. But, sure i
was gathering some information from wikipedia related to my
home assignments at KIMEP , and i can say that they were
reliable, i mean i got the exact info that i need. But that "reliability" lasted not so long, actually... Because problems with the source's credibility started when i took more serious classes like RRW, or Principles of marketing, etc. where the citation and the system of references was very strict and demanded from students more responsibility for the information they get and use for the projects. :-) Of course, I heard a
lot about Wikipedia from other people and they all are
satisfied by it’s sources. However there is one considerable minus - Wikipedia is often not accepted by our proffesors as a true objective and authorised source because it is organized exactly in a way that every person has an opportunity to go and edit entries! Another problem that is related more to student affairs is that there may be such cases when 15 students from 30 in class ( i.e.)
will bring the same assignment, but from other hand i don’t
think that it depends on the source, it depend how person is
searching.
In the end i want to say that Wikipedia is very very popular
source especially for students, so where is the demand their is
a supply, isn’t it?
search information that is reliable for me by online. But, sure i
was gathering some information from wikipedia related to my
home assignments at KIMEP , and i can say that they were
reliable, i mean i got the exact info that i need. But that "reliability" lasted not so long, actually... Because problems with the source's credibility started when i took more serious classes like RRW, or Principles of marketing, etc. where the citation and the system of references was very strict and demanded from students more responsibility for the information they get and use for the projects. :-) Of course, I heard a
lot about Wikipedia from other people and they all are
satisfied by it’s sources. However there is one considerable minus - Wikipedia is often not accepted by our proffesors as a true objective and authorised source because it is organized exactly in a way that every person has an opportunity to go and edit entries! Another problem that is related more to student affairs is that there may be such cases when 15 students from 30 in class ( i.e.)
will bring the same assignment, but from other hand i don’t
think that it depends on the source, it depend how person is
searching.
In the end i want to say that Wikipedia is very very popular
source especially for students, so where is the demand their is
a supply, isn’t it?
|
|
Latest page update: made by
Anonymous
, Jun 26 2007, 1:46 AM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Natalie
- anonymous
56 words added 7 words deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonymous | mywebsite | 0 | Aug 6 2007, 1:10 AM EDT by Anonymous | ||
|
|
|||||
| Natalie_Sunny | Hello! | 0 | Jun 27 2007, 1:00 AM EDT by Natalie_Sunny | ||
|
Thread started: Jun 27 2007, 1:00 AM EDT
Watch
Zarina, hi! I recommend you to look through your topic one more time, because i have contributed to it a little :-)
|
|||||
Showing 2 of 2 threads for this page
